Castelazo & Associates v. United States
This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 1050 (Castelazo & Associates v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of wall-hanging fixtures similar in all material respects to the wrought-iron ornaments the subject of Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc v. United States (47 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 2289) and that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of wall-hanging ornaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of Alpine Importers of Calif. v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 81, C.D. 2555), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 Cust. Ct. 1050, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castelazo-associates-v-united-states-cusc-1968.