Castelazo & Associates, Inc. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 352
United States Customs Court·Decided February 23, 1960·No. No. 63841; protests 301688-K, etc. (Los Angeles)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rattan flower cages the same in all material, respects as those the subject of Quon Quon Company v. United States (41 Cust. Ct. 181, C.D. 2039), except that the merchandise involved herein consists of cages, composed wholly or in chief value of rattancore, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. Abstract 59235 followed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Castelazo & Associates, Inc. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 352 (cusc 1960).
44 Cust. Ct. 352 (Castelazo & Associates, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Quon Quon Co. v. United States
41 Cust. Ct. 181 (U.S. Customs Court, 1958)