Castelazo & Associates, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Castelazo & Associates, Inc. v. United States

44 Cust. Ct. 352

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 23, 1960

DocketNo. 63841; protests 301688-K, etc. (Los Angeles)

StatusPublished

This text of 44 Cust. Ct. 352 (Castelazo & Associates, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Castelazo & Associates, Inc. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 352 (cusc 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rattan flower cages the same in all material, respects as those the subject of Quon Quon Company v. United States (41 Cust. Ct. 181, C.D. 2039), except that the merchandise involved herein consists of cages, composed wholly or in chief value of rattancore, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. Abstract 59235 followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rattan flower cages the same in all material, respects as those the subject of Quon Quon Company v. United States (41 Cust. Ct. 181, C.D. 2039), except that the merchandise involved herein consists of cages, composed wholly or in chief value of rattancore, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. Abstract 59235 followed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 Cust. Ct. 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castelazo-associates-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack