Casteel v. Clarence Hodson & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Casteel v. Clarence Hodson & Co.

258 A.D. 953, 17 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8384

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 26, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 953 (Casteel v. Clarence Hodson & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Casteel v. Clarence Hodson & Co., 258 A.D. 953, 17 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8384 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

—■ Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — O’Malley, Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.; Untermyer and Callahan, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial upon the ground that the holding by the court that as matter of law the plaintiff was entitled to recover commissions on sales made outside the principal territory named in the contract of hiring was improper.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—■ Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — O’Malley, Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.; Untermyer and Callahan, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial upon the ground that the holding by the court that as matter of law the plaintiff was entitled to recover commissions on sales made outside the principal territory named in the contract of hiring was improper.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 953, 17 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casteel-v-clarence-hodson-co-nyappdiv-1940.