Casteel v. Clarence Hodson Co., Inc.
28 N.E.2d 410, 283 N.Y. 688, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1129
This text of 28 N.E.2d 410 (Casteel v. Clarence Hodson Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Casteel v. Clarence Hodson Co., Inc., 28 N.E.2d 410, 283 N.Y. 688, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1129 (N.Y. 1940).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Lotjghran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis and Conway, JJ. Dissenting: Lehman, Ch. J., and Sears, J., on the ground that errors in the charge require a reversal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 N.E.2d 410, 283 N.Y. 688, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casteel-v-clarence-hodson-co-inc-ny-1940.