Castanheira v. Dept. of Veterans
Opinion
USCA1 Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 96-2119
ALVARO T. CASTANHEIRA,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Patti B. Saris, U.S. District Judge] ___________________
____________________
Before
Selya, Cyr and Boudin, Circuit Judges. ______________
____________________
Alvaro T. Castanheira on brief pro se. _____________________
Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Sara Miron Bloom, _______________ _________________
Assistant United States Attorney, on Motion for Summary Disposition
for appellees.
____________________
February 12, 1997
____________________
Per Curiam. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties ___________
and the record on appeal. We affirm essentially for the
reasons stated in the district court's memorandum and order
of September 6, 1996.
Affirmed. _________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Castanheira v. Dept. of Veterans, (1st Cir. 1997).
Castanheira v. Dept. of Veterans (Castanheira v. Dept. of Veterans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.