Castaneira v. Jorgensen
57 F. App'x 279
This text of 57 F. App'x 279 (Castaneira v. Jorgensen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Castaneira v. Jorgensen, 57 F. App'x 279 (8th Cir. 2003).
Opinion
South Dakota inmate Eric Castaneira appeals the district court’s1 dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 action. After de novo review, see Hanten v. Sch. Dist. of Riverview Gardens, 183 F.3d 799, 805 (8th Cir.1999), we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jurisdiction, powers, and temporary assignment
28 U.S.C. § 636(c)
Civil action for deprivation of rights
42 U.S.C. § 1983
§ 1985
42 U.S.C. § 1985
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
57 F. App'x 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castaneira-v-jorgensen-ca8-2003.