Castaldo v. Migay Trucking Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Castaldo v. Migay Trucking Corp.

61 A.D.2d 772, 402 N.Y.S.2d 22, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10174

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 21, 1978

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 61 A.D.2d 772 (Castaldo v. Migay Trucking Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Castaldo v. Migay Trucking Corp., 61 A.D.2d 772, 402 N.Y.S.2d 22, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10174 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 10, 1977, unanimously reversed, on the law, defendant-appellant’s motion for renewal granted, and, on renewal, defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the affirmative defense of diplomatic immunity granted, and the complaint dismissed, and the action severed as to him, without costs and without disbursements; appeal from order of the same court, entered March 3, 1977, dismissed as academic, without costs, it having been superseded by the order entered May 10, 1977. On these papers, there is no doubt that the movant defendant is clothed with diplomatic immunity. (See Kobelski v Permanent Mission of Fed. Republic of Germany to United Nations, 54 AD2d 867.) Nor may the case survive against defendant-appellant’s insurance carrier, that liability being purely derivative. We may not take cognizance of appellant’s request that we dismiss Dole v Dow cross claims of other defendants, not parties to this appeal; those matters are not properly before us. Concur—Silverman, J. P., Evans, Fein and Markewich, JJ. [62 AD2d 932.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 10, 1977, unanimously reversed, on the law, defendant-appellant’s motion for renewal granted, and, on renewal, defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the affirmative defense of diplomatic immunity granted, and the complaint dismissed, and the action severed as to him, without costs and without disbursements; appeal from order of the same court, entered March 3, 1977, dismissed as academic, without costs, it having been superseded by the order entered May 10, 1977. On these papers, there is no doubt that the movant defendant is clothed with diplomatic immunity. (See Kobelski v Permanent Mission of Fed. Republic of Germany to United Nations, 54 AD2d 867.) Nor may the case survive against defendant-appellant’s insurance carrier, that liability being purely derivative. We may not take cognizance of appellant’s request that we dismiss Dole v Dow cross claims of other defendants, not parties to this appeal; those matters are not properly before us. Concur—Silverman, J. P., Evans, Fein and Markewich, JJ. [62 AD2d 932.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A.D.2d 772, 402 N.Y.S.2d 22, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/castaldo-v-migay-trucking-corp-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack