Castaldi v. United States

384 U.S. 886, 86 S. Ct. 1906, 16 L. Ed. 2d 993, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1137

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 10, 1966·No. 33·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for further proceedings in the light of Shillitani v. United States, ante, p. 364.

Mr. Justice Black concurs in the result. Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons stated in his opinion in Cheff v. Schnackenberg, ante, at 380.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Mr. Justice Black concurs in the result. Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons stated in his opinion in Cheff v. Schnackenberg, ante, at 380.

Castaldi v. United States, 384 U.S. 886, 86 S. Ct. 1906, 16 L. Ed. 2d 993, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1137 (1966).

Pincite

384 U.S. 886 (Castaldi v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

United States v. Munoz Franco

123 F. Supp. 2d 45 (D. Puerto Rico, 2000)

United States v. Warren

373 A.2d 874 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1977)

United States v. Mandujano

425 U.S. 564 (Supreme Court, 1976)

Walter Martin, Jr. v. United States

517 F.2d 906 (Eighth Circuit, 1975)

Sherrie Bursey and Brenda Joyce Presley v. United States

466 F.2d 1059 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)

In Re Carol Vericker

446 F.2d 244 (Second Circuit, 1971)

United States v. Harold Kaufman

393 F.2d 172 (Seventh Circuit, 1968)

Opinion

Related