Castaing v. State ex rel. Vinson

95 So. 859, 85 Fla. 289
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 6, 1923·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This writ of error was taken to a peremptory writ of mandamus issued by the Circuit Judge commanding the mayor and clerk of the municipality to issue and deliver to the relator a warrant of the city for $3500.00 and to receive from relator a deed purporting to convey real estate to the city.

It does not appear that the city authorities had duly purchased and accepted the' property and had duly ordered the warrant to be issued, therefore mandamus is not applicable.

Reversed.

[290]*290Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne and West, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Castaing v. State ex rel. Vinson, 95 So. 859, 85 Fla. 289 (Fla. 1923).

95 So. 859 (Castaing v. State ex rel. Vinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lee v. State
176 So. 764 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)