Casso v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Casso v. State

592 So. 2d 1145, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 15, 1992 WL 277

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 3, 1992

DocketNo. 91-2636

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 592 So. 2d 1145 (Casso v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Casso v. State, 592 So. 2d 1145, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 15, 1992 WL 277 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although there has been some confusion as to whether the order on appeal is pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 or 3.800(a), we treat it as being a rule 3.800(a) appeal. (The grounds argued by appellant have aspects of both ineffective assistance of counsel and illegal sentence, but it is primarily the latter.) Our analysis and disposition would be the same under either rule, and by treating this as a rule 3.800(a) appeal, we give the appellant the additional opportunity to file a brief. Appellant has done so, and pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315, we have determined that no answer brief is necessary, and that an expedited disposition is appropriate. Having considered appellant’s brief, the record on appeal, and the very thorough order of the trial court, we conclude that no error exists.

AFFIRMED.

GUNTHER, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Although there has been some confusion as to whether the order on appeal is pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 or 3.800(a), we treat it as being a rule 3.800(a) appeal. (The grounds argued by appellant have aspects of both ineffective assistance of counsel and illegal sentence, but it is primarily the latter.) Our analysis and disposition would be the same under either rule, and by treating this as a rule 3.800(a) appeal, we give the appellant the additional opportunity to file a brief. Appellant has done so, and pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315, we have determined that no answer brief is necessary, and that an expedited disposition is appropriate. Having considered appellant’s brief, the record on appeal, and the very thorough order of the trial court, we conclude that no error exists.

AFFIRMED.

GUNTHER, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

592 So. 2d 1145, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 15, 1992 WL 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casso-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack