Cassinelli v. Cassinelli

138 S. Ct. 69, 199 L. Ed. 2d 2, 86 U.S.L.W. 3148, 2017 WL 1480713, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 6006
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 2, 2017
DocketNo. 16–8811.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 138 S. Ct. 69 (Cassinelli v. Cassinelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cassinelli v. Cassinelli, 138 S. Ct. 69, 199 L. Ed. 2d 2, 86 U.S.L.W. 3148, 2017 WL 1480713, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 6006 (U.S. 2017).

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two for further consideration in light of Howell v. Howell, 581 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 1400, 197 L.Ed.2d 781 (2017).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michael B. Yourko v. Lee Ann B. Yourko
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2021
In re Marriage of Cassinelli
California Court of Appeal, 2018

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 S. Ct. 69, 199 L. Ed. 2d 2, 86 U.S.L.W. 3148, 2017 WL 1480713, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 6006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cassinelli-v-cassinelli-scotus-2017.