Cassidy v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Cassidy v. State

243 So. 2d 393, 46 Ala. App. 410, 1971 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 419

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedJanuary 12, 1971

Docket7 Div. 65

StatusPublished

This text of 243 So. 2d 393 (Cassidy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cassidy v. State, 243 So. 2d 393, 46 Ala. App. 410, 1971 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 419 (Ala. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

The record in this appeal omits any declaration of the organization of the court whence it comes. This appeal being thus abortive must, therefore, be dismissed.

The organization of the trial court must be shown at the beginning of the transcript for an appeal. A form for such showing is set forth in Supreme Court Rule 24.

The lack of such a declaration is jurisdictional and appellate courts take notice thereof ex mero motu. McPherson v. Stallworth, 262 Ala. 367, 78 So.2d 924; West v. Camp, 264 Ala. 644, 89 So.2d 170; Barnes v. Salter, 270 Ala. 110, 116 So.2d 748; Sparrow v. Evans, 275 Ala. 89, 152 So.2d 155; Wilson v. State, 275 Ala. 402, 155 So.2d 506; Tidwell v. State, 41 Ala.App. 296, 130 So.2d 206; Bunn v. State, 44 Ala.App. 68, 202 So.2d 176.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI