Cassidy v. Kruvant

127 A. 339, 97 N.J. Eq. 372, 12 Stock. 372, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 537
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 19, 1925·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curium.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion hied in' the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance—Tiie Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, Clark, McG-lennon, Kays, JJ. 13.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cassidy v. Kruvant, 127 A. 339, 97 N.J. Eq. 372, 12 Stock. 372, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 537 (N.J. 1925).

127 A. 339 (Cassidy v. Kruvant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. Morris
184 So. 2d 148 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1966)
Weinstein v. Swartz
68 A.2d 865 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1949)
Wilsdon v. Wilsdon
135 A. 921 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1926)