Cassidy v. Knapp

31 A. 638, 167 Pa. 305, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 899
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 8, 1895·No. Appeal No. 104·Published·Cited by 19 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Fell,

The assignments of error relating to the failure of the plaintiff to comply with the Amended Equity Rules adopted January 15,1894, must be sustained. These rules were formulated and adopted to regulate the practice of equity in the several courts of common pleas in the commonwealth, and went into effect on the first Monday of March, 1894. They were established under the direction and by the authority of an act of the legislature, and have all the force and effect of a positive enactment. All proceedings in equity which are not in conformity with them are irregular and void.

The preliminary injunction in this case was based upon a bill [308] which was not in compliance with the rules, and this failure is fatal to the whole proceeding. This being the case it is unnecessary to consider the remaining assignments.

The order of the court of common pleas of September 14,. 1894, granting a preliminary injunction, is reversed and set aside at the cost of the appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cassidy v. Knapp, 31 A. 638, 167 Pa. 305, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 899 (Pa. 1895).

31 A. 638 (Cassidy v. Knapp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Surco Products, Inc. v. Kieszek
80 A.2d 842 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1951)
Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Himelfarb
66 A.2d 257 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1949)
Wanamaker v. Wanamaker
172 A. 646 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)
Mintzer v. Turnbach
172 A. 162 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)
Strizak v. Danacko
11 Pa. D. & C. 150 (Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, 1928)
Horner v. Sanderson
9 Pa. D. & C. 296 (Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas, 1927)
Borough of Summerhill v. Sherbine
88 Pa. Super. 419 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1926)
Rader v. Keiper
132 A. 824 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1926)
Walters v. Tamaqua Borough
6 Pa. D. & C. 323 (Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, 1925)
Coombe Garment Co. v. Morris
52 Pa. Super. 624 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)
Green v. Prince Metallic Paint Co.
25 Pa. Super. 415 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1904)
Hughes v. Antill
23 Pa. Super. 290 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1903)
Yetter v. Delaware Valley Railroad
56 A. 57 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1903)
Hinnershitz v. United Traction Co.
55 A. 841 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1903)
Cooke v. Central District & Printing Telegraph Co.
21 Pa. Super. 43 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)
Gwinn v. Lee
6 Pa. Super. 646 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1898)
Thrall v. City of Williamsport
4 Pa. Super. 165 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)
Buffalo & St. Mary's Railroad v. Philadelphia & Erie Railroad
34 A. 561 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)
Brinton v. Hogue
33 A. 554 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)