Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cassidy v. John

Cassidy v. John

609 So. 2d 778, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13744, 1992 WL 385466
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 30, 1992
DocketNo. 91-3568
StatusPublished

This text of 609 So. 2d 778 (Cassidy v. John) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cassidy v. John, 609 So. 2d 778, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13744, 1992 WL 385466 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. As to the issue regarding improper argument of counsel, see Nelson v. Reliance Insurance Co., 368 So.2d 361 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

ANSTEAD and WARNER, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge; concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nelson v. Reliance Ins. Co.
368 So. 2d 361 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
609 So. 2d 778, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13744, 1992 WL 385466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cassidy-v-john-fladistctapp-1992.