Cassidy v. Hudson Transit Corporation
20 N.E.2d 1021, 280 N.Y. 667, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1477
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, Htjbbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. O’Bbien, J., concurs solely on authority of Tedia v. Ellman (280 N. Y. 124).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cassidy v. Hudson Transit Corporation, 20 N.E.2d 1021, 280 N.Y. 667, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1477 (N.Y. 1939).
20 N.E.2d 1021 (Cassidy v. Hudson Transit Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. Hine
281 A.D. 387 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)
Wager v. State
257 A.D. 580 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)