Cassidy v. First National Bank

19 Fla. Supp. 120
CourtCircuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County
DecidedJuly 29, 1960
DocketNo. 59-C-3260
StatusPublished

This text of 19 Fla. Supp. 120 (Cassidy v. First National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cassidy v. First National Bank, 19 Fla. Supp. 120 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1960).

Opinion

MARSHALL C. WISEHEART, Circuit Judge.

This cause originated upon a complaint filed by the plaintiff, James M. Cassidy, as administrator ad litem of the estate of John [121]*121P. Cassidy, deceased, against the defendant, the First National Bank of Miami, as executor of the estate of Florence Deegan Cassidy, deceased. The plaintiff seeks to impress a constructive trust upon all the assets of the estate of Florence Deegan Cassidy that were obtained by her from her husband, John P. Cassidy, subsequent to January 1, 1955, alleging that his mental and physical condition was such that he was incompetent and lacked the capacity to effect transfers of his property. An accounting of all the dividends, stock splits, cash and interest from these assets is also prayed for.

The defendant filed an answer admitting that it was acting in a dual capacity as executor of the estate of John P. Cassidy and as executor of the estate of Florence Deegan Cassidy; that James M. Cassidy, another brother, Michael Kaufman, a nephew, Marjorie Kaufman, a niece, and Mary Kaufman, another niece, are legatees under the will of John P. Cassidy and interested in his estate; and that the plaintiff is the duly appointed administrator ad litem of the estate of John P. Cassidy.

As to the other allegations set forth in the complaint, the defendant says that it is without knowledge as to the truth or falsity of these allegations and that it denies that it wrongfully detains these assets. An affirmative defense is set up that the claim filed in the county judge’s court is defective and void.

Upon these issues made by the pleadings, the matter came on for final hearing before the court. Evidence was submitted by the parties. At the conclusion of the trial, the plaintiff moved for leave to amend his complaint to conform to the evidence pursuant to Florida rule of civil procedure 1.15(b) and by said amendment charges fraud, undue influence, and forgery of Florence D. Cassidy in obtaining all of the principal assets of her husband, John P. Cassidy, within the last nineteen months of his life. During this period, he was suffering from heart trouble, leukemia, senility, generalized arteriosclerosis and specifically cerebral arteriosclerosis, which caused him to lack the capacity to know the extent of his property, to have the requisite donative intent, and to be unable to know the effect of signing the instruments which transferred the properties alleged to be gifts by the defendant. At the same time, the defendant argued its motion for summary judgment.

Upon the evidence presented and the arguments delivered in this cause by counsel for the respective parties, and the court being fully advised in the premises, it makes the following findings of fact and arrives at the following conclusions of law —

[122]*122 Findings of Fact

1. In 1951, John P. Cassidy, a widower, 73 years of age, married Florence Deegan, a first cousin 31 years his junior who had, prior to this time, worked and earned her livelihood as a typist. Prior to 1951, when they purchased a home in Coral Gables, they were residents of Chicago where John P. Cassidy had a wide acquaintanceship and had there, through his own efforts, amassed a substantial fortune. Most of his relatives and friends were also Chicago residents. He was a stranger to Coral Gables; had very few friends and no relatives in this area.

2.. In January 1953, John P. Cassidy was confined to the Woodlawn Hospital in Chicago with a heart attack. After discharge from the said hospital on March 1, 1953, he was accompanied from Chicago to Miami by a nurse; At this time, and for some years past, John P. Cassidy had been suffering from leukemia.

3. His mental and physical condition progressively deteriorated to. such an extent that during the year 1955 he was unable to handle his financial affairs. His 1953 federal tax return was the last one in which he was able to be of assistance to his tax consultant.

4. When, in early 1955, the time came to make out his 1954 federal tax return, he was unable to give or supply the necessary information to his tax consultant, who in turn, was obliged to make extensive investigation, and write letters to banks and brokers in an attempt to gather the information necessary to prepare the return. It was at this time that his wife actively took over all of his financial affairs.

5. Decedent was attended by Dr. Frederick Poppe of Coral Gables, who diagnosed and recorded his findings at the time as follows —

January 6, 1955 — This patient is getting a bit senile and we will have to watch his mental capacity so we can advise his wife.
February 9, 1955 — We can check on his chronic lymphatic leukemia from time to time.
May 9, 1955 — I believe he is all over his upper respiratory infection and the present downhill course could be due to his increased effects from his leukemia. Patient doesn’t understand these things as he can’t even remember that he has been told that he has leukemia.
August if, 1955 — Patient has been losing weight regularly.
November if, 1955 — Sat with the pt. and talked to him about his troubles and told him he was having lapses of memory, for instance, he didn’t know me the time before last (October 13, 1955) when he came in here, even though I have seen him off and on for several years and [123]*123a number of times recently. He said “I don’t know you, do I?” and definitely had a blank expression. Of course, it is difficult talking to a person like this and make them realize what we are talking about. He talks about being abused and that his wife picks on him, etc. Of course, I have heard the other side of the story, so I took the practical nurse aside and she says the main contention seems to be that Mr. Cassidy has the idea that everyone is trying to get his money, especially his wife.
April 21¡, 1956 — Saw patient today at the request of his wife, as the pt. is getting more and more difficult to handle. He greeted me as usual, didn’t realize who I was, I asked him if he knew my name and he couldn’t remember it. He couldn’t remember how long it has been since he had seen me as a pt., and finally mentioned about 10 or 11 years, and of course, I saw him three months ago, on several occasions in January, 1956 and all last year quite a few times. I then ask him what year it was and he couldn’t even guess. I ask if he knew what city this was and he said “yes” and when I asked him what city, he said, “Chicago”. I then asked him if he thought Franklin Delano Roosevelt would run again and he didn’t think he would run again. He didn’t know who was running.
I ask him who was president at this time and he had no idea. He said he never heard of Truman. I talked about his leukemia and blood trouble and he seemed completely confused, as usual, about that condition.
Diagnosis — Complete disorientation as to time, place and person. This is due to generalized arteriosclerosis, specifically cerebral arteriosclerosis.

6. His wife was well aware of this condition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Fla. Supp. 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cassidy-v-first-national-bank-flacirct11mia-1960.