Cassidy v. Cassidy

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cassidy v. Cassidy

963 S.W.2d 474, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 408

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cassidy v. Cassidy. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 600 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 10, 1998·No. No. 72699·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this domestic relations matter, the trial court granted Father’s motion to modify, giving him primary physical custody of child. However, it did not award him any child support, finding the presumed child support to be unjust and inappropriate.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this domestic relations matter, the trial court granted Father’s motion to modify, giving him primary physical custody of child. However, it did not award him any child support, finding the presumed child support to be unjust and inappropriate.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cassidy v. Cassidy, 963 S.W.2d 474, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 408 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

963 S.W.2d 474 (Cassidy v. Cassidy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.