Casserino v. City of Rochester

267 A.D.2d 967, 700 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13681
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 30, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 267 A.D.2d 967 (Casserino v. City of Rochester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Casserino v. City of Rochester, 267 A.D.2d 967, 700 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13681 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

[968]*968exhaust their administrative remedies with respect to their contention that they were entitled to a use variance, and this Court has no discretionary power to reach it (see, Matter of Nelson v Coughlin, 188 AD2d 1071, appeal dismissed 81 NY2d 834). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Fisher, J. — CPLR art 78.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

J A J K, Inc. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control
272 A.D.2d 963 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 A.D.2d 967, 700 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casserino-v-city-of-rochester-nyappdiv-1999.