Cassent v. Utyro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cassent v. Utyro

234 A.D. 786

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 234 A.D. 786 (Cassent v. Utyro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cassent v. Utyro, 234 A.D. 786 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modified by striking therefrom the words “ Ordered that the counterclaim be and the same is dismissed; and it is further,” and by providing that, in addition to paragraphs 6, 7, 8 and 9, paragraph 15 be stricken out. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. Paragraphs 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20 constitute a counterclaim and they should not have been stricken out. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified by striking therefrom the words “ Ordered that the counterclaim be and the same is dismissed; and it is further,” and by providing that, in addition to paragraphs 6, 7, 8 and 9, paragraph 15 be stricken out. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. Paragraphs 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20 constitute a counterclaim and they should not have been stricken out. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D. 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cassent-v-utyro-nyappdiv-1931.