Cassels v. Davis

Fifth Circuit

Cassels v. Davis

240 F. 1022, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2457

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 6, 1917·No. No. 2848·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

An examination of the record in this case in the light of the arguments of counsel has led the majority of the court to the conclusion that it does not show the commission of any reversible error. We think that the propriety of the decree appealed from is sufficiently shown by the [1023]*1023opinion rendered by the District Judge. Davis v. Cassels, 220 Fed. 958. That decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

An examination of the record in this case in the light of the arguments of counsel has led the majority of the court to the conclusion that it does not show the commission of any reversible error. We think that the propriety of the decree appealed from is sufficiently shown by the [1023]*1023opinion rendered by the District Judge. Davis v. Cassels, 220 Fed. 958. That decree is affirmed.

Cassels v. Davis, 240 F. 1022, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2457 (5th Cir. 1917).

Pincite

240 F. 1022 (Cassels v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related