Casselman v. Village of Lowville
This text of 2 A.D.3d 1281 (Casselman v. Village of Lowville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of Supreme Court, Jefferson County (Gilbert, J.), entered December 19, 2002, which granted the petition and annulled the determination denying petitioner’s application for General Municipal Law § 207-c benefits.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs.
Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging respondent’s determination to deny his application for benefits under General Municipal Law § 207-c on the ground that petitioner’s injury was not “incurred in the performance of special work related to the nature of heightened risks and duties” of police work (Balcerak v County of Nassau, 94 NY2d 253, 259 [1999]). Supreme Court properly granted the petition and annulled the determination. “[I]n order to be eligible for section 207-c benefits, a covered municipal employee need only prove a ‘direct causal relationship between job duties and the resulting illness or injury’ ” (Matter of Theroux v Reilly, 1 NY3d 232, 243-244 [2003]). Petitioner proved such a direct [1282]*1282causal relationship and thus demonstrated his entitlement to benefits under General Municipal Law § 207-c. Present—Green, J.P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 A.D.3d 1281, 768 N.Y.S.2d 890, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casselman-v-village-of-lowville-nyappdiv-2003.