Cassells v. Kinney

Texas Supreme Court

Cassells v. Kinney

39 Tex. 431

Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1873·Published

Opinion

McAdoo, J.

The petition for writ of error in this cause does not state the place of the residence of the defendant in error, nor does it allege that the place of his residence is unknown.

The writ of error in no manner cures this defect, for it does .not state the residence of the defendant in error.

[432]*432On the authority of Roberts v. Sollabellus, 10 Texas, 352, and Jordan v. Terry, administrator, 33 Texas, 380,. the motion to dismiss the cause must prevail.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McAdoo, J.

The petition for writ of error in this cause does not state the place of the residence of the defendant in error, nor does it allege that the place of his residence is unknown.

The writ of error in no manner cures this defect, for it does .not state the residence of the defendant in error.

[432]*432On the authority of Roberts v. Sollabellus, 10 Texas, 352, and Jordan v. Terry, administrator, 33 Texas, 380,. the motion to dismiss the cause must prevail.

Dismissed.

Cassells v. Kinney, 39 Tex. 431 (Tex. 1873).

Pincite

39 Tex. 431 (Cassells v. Kinney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related