Cassells v. Kinney

39 Tex. 431
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1873
StatusPublished

This text of 39 Tex. 431 (Cassells v. Kinney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cassells v. Kinney, 39 Tex. 431 (Tex. 1873).

Opinion

McAdoo, J.

The petition for writ of error in this cause does not state the place of the residence of the defendant in error, nor does it allege that the place of his residence is unknown.

The writ of error in no manner cures this defect, for it does .not state the residence of the defendant in error.

[432]*432On the authority of Roberts v. Sollabellus, 10 Texas, 352, and Jordan v. Terry, administrator, 33 Texas, 380,. the motion to dismiss the cause must prevail.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roberts v. Sollibellus
10 Tex. 352 (Texas Supreme Court, 1853)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 Tex. 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cassells-v-kinney-tex-1873.