Cassell v. Mueller

122 A. 242, 99 N.J.L. 270, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 198
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 28, 1923·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, WHITE, HEPPENHEIMER, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None. *Page 273

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cassell v. Mueller, 122 A. 242, 99 N.J.L. 270, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 198 (N.J. 1923).

122 A. 242 (Cassell v. Mueller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pacific Employers Insurance v. Chavez
54 P.2d 701 (California Supreme Court, 1936)