Cassell v. Mueller
122 A. 242, 99 N.J.L. 270, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 198
This text of 122 A. 242 (Cassell v. Mueller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cassell v. Mueller, 122 A. 242, 99 N.J.L. 270, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 198 (N.J. 1923).
Opinion
The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, WHITE, HEPPENHEIMER, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None. *Page 273
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pacific Employers Insurance v. Chavez
54 P.2d 701 (California Supreme Court, 1936)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
122 A. 242, 99 N.J.L. 270, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cassell-v-mueller-nj-1923.