Cassell v. Mueller
122 A. 242, 99 N.J.L. 270, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 198
Opinion
The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, WHITE, HEPPENHEIMER, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None. *Page 273
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cassell v. Mueller, 122 A. 242, 99 N.J.L. 270, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 198 (N.J. 1923).
122 A. 242 (Cassell v. Mueller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pacific Employers Insurance v. Chavez
54 P.2d 701 (California Supreme Court, 1936)