Cassell v. Lancaster Mennonite Conference

853 A.2d 1009, 578 Pa. 428, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 1283
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 14, 2004
DocketAppeal No. 835 MAL 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 853 A.2d 1009 (Cassell v. Lancaster Mennonite Conference) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cassell v. Lancaster Mennonite Conference, 853 A.2d 1009, 578 Pa. 428, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 1283 (Pa. 2004).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of June, 2004, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issue:

Whether the Superior Court departed from the established Frye standard by concluding the psychologist’s methodology was generally accepted in the field.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Busy Bee Inc. v. Corestates Bank N.A.
72 Pa. D. & C.4th 533 (Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
853 A.2d 1009, 578 Pa. 428, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 1283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cassell-v-lancaster-mennonite-conference-pa-2004.