Cassell v. Jagust

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7602

CHARLES M. CASSELL, III,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DOCTOR JAGUST; DOCTOR MICHALAS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:06-ct-03025-BO)

Submitted: January 30, 2009 Decided: February 18, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles M. Cassell, III, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles M. Cassell, III, appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Cassell v. Jagust, No. 5:06-ct-03025-BO (E.D.N.C.

Aug. 5, 2008). We deny the motions for appointment of counsel,

to show cause and compel officials to supply materials, for

injunctive relief, for reconsideration, and for access to this

and other courts. The motion “in the forma pauperis” is denied

as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED