Cassell v. Albert
1 Balt. C. Rep. 75
This text of 1 Balt. C. Rep. 75 (Cassell v. Albert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Baltimore City Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cassell v. Albert, 1 Balt. C. Rep. 75 (Md. Super. Ct. 1889).
Opinion
The plaintiff brought suit to recover for work done on plans furnished the defendant for buildings corner Fayette and Liberty streets, which were not used by defendant. The Court held that if the plaintiff was employed as an architect and he fully prepared suitable drawings, he was entitled to receive and recover a reasonable price for the same.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Balt. C. Rep. 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cassell-v-albert-mdsuperctbalt-1889.