Casselberry Alf, Inc. v. Agency for Health Care Administration

820 So. 2d 320, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14880, 2001 WL 1245089
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 19, 2001
DocketNo. 5D01-2517
StatusPublished

This text of 820 So. 2d 320 (Casselberry Alf, Inc. v. Agency for Health Care Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Casselberry Alf, Inc. v. Agency for Health Care Administration, 820 So. 2d 320, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14880, 2001 WL 1245089 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Casselberry ALF, Inc., an assisted living facility, seeks review of a non-final agency action of the State of Florida Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA). The complained-of action taken by AHCA consists of an order of immediate moratorium on admissions to Cassel-berry’s assisted living facility pending a formal administrative hearing. Although we decline to set aside the order of immediate moratorium at this time, we agree with Casselberry that in light of the exigent circumstances, the instant case should be remanded for an expedited formal administrative hearing. See, e.g., Stock v. Department of Banking & Fin., 584 So.2d 112 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

[321]*321REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

GRIFFIN, SAWAYA and ORFINGER, R. B., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stock v. DEPT. OF BANKING & FINANCE
584 So. 2d 112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
820 So. 2d 320, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14880, 2001 WL 1245089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casselberry-alf-inc-v-agency-for-health-care-administration-fladistctapp-2001.