Cassel v. I. R. E. Financial Corp.
This text of 387 So. 2d 377 (Cassel v. I. R. E. Financial Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is the second appeal in this case wherein appellant charges appellee with usury. For a statement of the facts and issues, see our prior opinion, I. R. E. Financial Corporation v. Cassel, 335 So.2d 598 (Fla.3d DCA 1976).
We have carefully considered the points on appeal in the light of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel and have concluded that no reversible error has been made to appear. See Plapinger v. Eckerd’s Silver Star, Inc., 360 So.2d 445 (Fla.3d DCA 1978), cert. denied 366 So.2d 883 (Fla.1979); Dixon v. Sharp, 276 So.2d 817 (Fla.1973); Mid State Homes, Inc. v. Staines, 161 So.2d 569 (Fla.2d DCA), cert. denied 166 So.2d 594 (Fla.1964); Indian Lake Estates, Inc. v. Special Investments, Inc., 154 So.2d 883, 890 (Fla.2d DCA 1963); Davidson v. Davis, 59 Fla. 476, 52 So. 139 (Fla.1910).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
387 So. 2d 377, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cassel-v-i-r-e-financial-corp-fladistctapp-1980.