Cassedy v. State

7 S.E.2d 190, 61 Ga. App. 621, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 194
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 5, 1940·No. 28008.·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. It appears from the bill of exceptions and the record that the defendant’s motion for new trial was overruled on August 1, 1939, and the bill of exceptions was presented to the judge on August 21, 1939. The presentation was within twenty days of the judgment excepted to, and the motion to dismiss the writ of error is denied.

2. The defendant was tried on an accusation which charged him with selling an automobile which he had bought from Joe Garrett under a re-ta.ined-title contract, with intent to defraud said Garrett. The evidence failed to show that the defendant sold the automobile as charged in the accusation; and therefore the verdict of guilty was unauthorized. The court erred in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment reversed.

MacIntyre and Gtuerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cassedy v. State, 7 S.E.2d 190, 61 Ga. App. 621, 1940 Ga. App. LEXIS 194 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940).

7 S.E.2d 190 (Cassedy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.