Cassedy v. Connecticut General Life Insurance

60 Misc. 2d 720, 304 N.Y.S.2d 142, 1969 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1373
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJuly 9, 1969
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 60 Misc. 2d 720 (Cassedy v. Connecticut General Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cassedy v. Connecticut General Life Insurance, 60 Misc. 2d 720, 304 N.Y.S.2d 142, 1969 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1373 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In our opinion, the amendment to the group insurance policy, which was agreed upon between defendant and the trustee and plan administrator, was binding upon plaintiff’s testator and effective to reduce the maximum medical catastrophe expense benefits from $10,000 to $5,000 as of December 8, 1964. Since it is undisputed that defendant has paid to plaintiff the maximum amount due under the policy, as amended, the action must be dismissed.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed, without costs and complaint dismissed.

Glickman and Pittoni, JJ., concur; Coyle, P. J., not voting.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Danzig v. Dikman
78 A.D.2d 303 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 Misc. 2d 720, 304 N.Y.S.2d 142, 1969 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cassedy-v-connecticut-general-life-insurance-nyappterm-1969.