Casseday v. United States of America

District of Columbia

Casseday v. United States of America

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedJanuary 30, 2012

DocketCivil Action No. 2011-2272

StatusPublished

This text of Casseday v. United States of America (Casseday v. United States of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Casseday v. United States of America, (D.D.C. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F I L E D FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

JAN 30 2012 RANDALL CASSEDY» > c‘§'§ll‘§ §’.;Fiill'%‘?§§¢§§?'é'f,'»`f.‘.’-§‘i',l’a Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Action No. ll-2272 (UNA) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Court provisionally permitted the above-captioned action to be filed on December

2l, 201 l. At that time, the Court directed plaintiff to submit a certified copy of his prison trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which plaintiff is or was confined, as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act. See 28 U.S.C. § l9l5. Plaintiff since has filed three motions, and has yet to produce the required trust

fund account statement. The Court will deny the plaintiff s motions and dismiss this action

i

DATE: //L/)/m/ U `ted l es D' trict Judge

4 »~»»7

without prejudice. An Order is issued separately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F I L E D FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

JAN 30 2012 RANDALL CASSEDY» > c‘§'§ll‘§ §’.;Fiill'%‘?§§¢§§?'é'f,'»`f.‘.’-§‘i',l’a Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Action No. ll-2272 (UNA) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Court provisionally permitted the above-captioned action to be filed on December

2l, 201 l. At that time, the Court directed plaintiff to submit a certified copy of his prison trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which plaintiff is or was confined, as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act. See 28 U.S.C. § l9l5. Plaintiff since has filed three motions, and has yet to produce the required trust

fund account statement. The Court will deny the plaintiff s motions and dismiss this action

i
DATE: //L/)/m/ U `ted l es D' trict Judge

4 »~»»7

without prejudice. An Order is issued separately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Casseday v. United States of America, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casseday-v-united-states-of-america-dcd-2012.