Cassavecca v. Airport Transportation Services, Inc.

110 A.D.2d 804, 488 N.Y.S.2d 227, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48709
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 22, 1985·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In light of a prior determination granting the plaintiff leave to interpose an amended bill of particulars alleging, for the first [805] time, augmented injuries with an apparent psychological or psychiatric component, the defendants should have been granted a brief additional period of time within which to conduct a single psychological or psychiatric examination of the plaintiff (see, Mignott v Sears, Roebuck & Co., 86 AD2d 794; Goldman v Linkoff, 45 AD2d 709; see also, Buerger v County of Erie, 101 AD2d 1025). Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cassavecca v. Airport Transportation Services, Inc., 110 A.D.2d 804, 488 N.Y.S.2d 227, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48709 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

110 A.D.2d 804 (Cassavecca v. Airport Transportation Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDowell v. Eagle Trans. Corp.
303 A.D.2d 655 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Spann v. Ellis
131 A.D.2d 558 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)