Cassata v. Harold C. Brown & Co.

195 A.D.2d 993, 602 N.Y.S.2d 569

This text of 195 A.D.2d 993 (Cassata v. Harold C. Brown & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cassata v. Harold C. Brown & Co., 195 A.D.2d 993, 602 N.Y.S.2d 569 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendant Harold C. Brown & Co., Inc. (Brown) submitted evidentiary materials establishing that its employee, defendant Harvey, was not acting within the scope of his employment with Brown when he provided investment advice and solicited plaintiffs’ participation in a lease investment program. Plaintiffs failed to submit proof in admissible form to controvert that evidence. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Denman, P. J., Balio, Lawton, Fallon and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 A.D.2d 993, 602 N.Y.S.2d 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cassata-v-harold-c-brown-co-nyappdiv-1993.