Cassarlie v. Shell Oil Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Cassarlie v. Shell Oil Co.

876 N.E.2d 968, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1409

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 21, 2007

Docket2007-1408

StatusPublished

This text of 876 N.E.2d 968 (Cassarlie v. Shell Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cassarlie v. Shell Oil Co., 876 N.E.2d 968, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1409 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 88361, 2007-Ohio-2633. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. [1410]*1410I.

Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. II and III. O’Connor, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Motion for admission pro hac vice of Anthony E. Farah by Sean S. Kelly granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 88361, 2007-Ohio-2633. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. [1410]*1410I.

Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. II and III. O’Connor, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Motion for admission pro hac vice of Anthony E. Farah by Sean S. Kelly granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

876 N.E.2d 968, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cassarlie-v-shell-oil-co-ohio-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack