Cassano v. Hagstrom

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cassano v. Hagstrom

5 A.D.2d 1003, 173 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6253

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 21, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.D.2d 1003 (Cassano v. Hagstrom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cassano v. Hagstrom, 5 A.D.2d 1003, 173 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6253 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death the appeal is from an order denying appellant’s motion to vacate the service of the summons and complaint. On this appeal appellant contends, inter alia, that section 229 of the Civil Practice Act has no application to him, a nonresident natural person and that the person served with the summons and complaint was not a managing agent within the scope of that section. Appellant is a substituted trustee of a foreign corporation doing business in this State and the person served was his station agent in this State. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion.

Wenzel, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death the appeal is from an order denying appellant’s motion to vacate the service of the summons and complaint. On this appeal appellant contends, inter alia, that section 229 of the Civil Practice Act has no application to him, a nonresident natural person and that the person served with the summons and complaint was not a managing agent within the scope of that section. Appellant is a substituted trustee of a foreign corporation doing business in this State and the person served was his station agent in this State. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion.

Wenzel, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.2d 1003, 173 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cassano-v-hagstrom-nyappdiv-1958.