Cassano v. Cassano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cassano v. Cassano

9 A.D.2d 693, 192 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6560

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 26, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.D.2d 693 (Cassano v. Cassano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cassano v. Cassano, 9 A.D.2d 693, 192 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6560 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from an order denying appellants’ motion to dismiss the first cause of action (for a judgment declaring respondent to be the lawful wife of appellant Cassano) and the second cause of action (to annul the purported marriage between the appellants) on the grounds that they do not state facts sufficient to constitute causes of action and that a prior action is pending and undetermined, in which action respondent is seeking a judgment of divorce from appellant Cassano, and to dismiss the third cause of action (to set aside a separation agreement between respondent and appellant Cassano) on the ground that that cause is barred by the Statute of Limitations. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur. [18 Misc 2d 981.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from an order denying appellants’ motion to dismiss the first cause of action (for a judgment declaring respondent to be the lawful wife of appellant Cassano) and the second cause of action (to annul the purported marriage between the appellants) on the grounds that they do not state facts sufficient to constitute causes of action and that a prior action is pending and undetermined, in which action respondent is seeking a judgment of divorce from appellant Cassano, and to dismiss the third cause of action (to set aside a separation agreement between respondent and appellant Cassano) on the ground that that cause is barred by the Statute of Limitations. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur. [18 Misc 2d 981.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 693, 192 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cassano-v-cassano-nyappdiv-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack