Cassandra Whitaker, as putative representative of the estate of Nashyra Whitaker v. Bianca Farmer, et al.

S.D. Texas

Cassandra Whitaker, as putative representative of the estate of Nashyra Whitaker v. Bianca Farmer, et al.

District Court, S.D. Texas·Decided February 18, 2026·No. 7:23-cv-00339·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT February 19, 2026 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk MCALLEN DIVISION CASSANDRA WHITAKER, as § putative representative of the estate of § NASHYRA WHITAKER § § Plaintiff, § § VS. § Civil Case No. 7:23-cv-00339 § BIANCA FARMER, et al., § § Defendants. § ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pending before the Court is the February 3, 2026 Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”) prepared by Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Dkt. No. 85). Judge Bray made findings and conclusions and recommended that Plaintiff’s Second Amended Motion for Default Judgment, (Dkt. No. 76), be granted. (Dkt. No. 85). The Parties were provided proper notice and the opportunity to object to the M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No party filed an objection. As a result, review is straightforward: plain error. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005). No plain error appears. Accordingly, the Court accepts the M&R and adopts it as the opinion of the Court. It is therefore ordered that: (1) Judge Bray’s M&R (Dkt. No. 85) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; (2) Default Judgment is hereby entered against Adriana Trevino, All Square Inc., Issac V. Garcia, and IZK LLC; and (3) Plaintiff’s Second Amended Motion for Default Judgment, (Dkt. No. 76), is GRANTED. It is SO ORDERED. Signed on February 18, 2026.

DREW B. TIPTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT February 19, 2026 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk MCALLEN DIVISION CASSANDRA WHITAKER, as § putative representative of the estate of § NASHYRA WHITAKER § § Plaintiff, § § VS. § Civil Case No. 7:23-cv-00339 § BIANCA FARMER, et al., § § Defendants. § ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pending before the Court is the February 3, 2026 Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”) prepared by Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Dkt. No. 85). Judge Bray made findings and conclusions and recommended that Plaintiff’s Second Amended Motion for Default Judgment, (Dkt. No. 76), be granted. (Dkt. No. 85). The Parties were provided proper notice and the opportunity to object to the M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No party filed an objection. As a result, review is straightforward: plain error. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005). No plain error appears. Accordingly, the Court accepts the M&R and adopts it as the opinion of the Court. It is therefore ordered that: (1) Judge Bray’s M&R (Dkt. No. 85) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; (2) Default Judgment is hereby entered against Adriana Trevino, All Square Inc., Issac V. Garcia, and IZK LLC; and (3) Plaintiff’s Second Amended Motion for Default Judgment, (Dkt. No. 76), is GRANTED. It is SO ORDERED. Signed on February 18, 2026.

DREW B. TIPTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cassandra Whitaker, as putative representative of the estate of Nashyra Whitaker v. Bianca Farmer, et al., (S.D. Tex. 2026).

Pincite

Cassandra Whitaker, as putative representative of the estate of Nashyra Whitaker v. Bianca Farmer, et al. (Cassandra Whitaker, as putative representative of the estate of Nashyra Whitaker v. Bianca Farmer, et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related