Cassandra Crioyos v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 9, 2011·No. 04-10-00918-CR·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00918-CR

Cassandra CRIOYOS, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010-CR-2854 Honorable Sharon MacRae, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 9, 2011

DISMISSED

The trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a

plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

Rule 25.2(d) provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant

has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” Tex. R. App. P.

25.2(d). Accordingly, on January 10, 2011, this court issued an order stating this appeal would

be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows 04-10-00918-CR

defendant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record. See Daniels v. State,110

S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order); Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); 37.1.

On January 26, 2011, defendant’s appellate counsel filed a letter stating “this court has no

choice but to dismiss the appeal.” In light of the record presented, we agree with defendant’s

counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is

dismissed.

Do not publish

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cassandra Crioyos v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Cassandra Crioyos v. State (Cassandra Crioyos v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)