Cassandra Alicia Briones v. the State of Texas
This text of Cassandra Alicia Briones v. the State of Texas (Cassandra Alicia Briones v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00756-CR
Cassandra Alicia BRIONES, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022CR9133 Honorable Christine Del Prado, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Lori Massey Brissette, Justice Adrian A. Spears II, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 26, 2025
DISMISSED
Pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant pleaded nolo contendere to aggravated assault with a
deadly weapon. The trial court sentenced her to eight years of deferred adjudication community
supervision and a $1,000 fine on October 7, 2024. The trial court also signed a certification
stating this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP.
P. 25.2(a)(2).
“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were
raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, (B) after getting the trial court’s 04-24-00756-CR
permission to appeal, or (C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute.” Id.
However, we must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of
appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id. R. 25.2(d).
Here, the clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed
the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by appellant. The record includes
at least one motion by appellant that was ruled upon, but it was ruled upon in appellant’s favor
before trial, and the plea bargain provides appellant waived the right to appeal written pretrial
motions. Moreover, the trial court has not given appellant permission to appeal. Thus, the trial
court’s certification appears to accurately reflect this is a plea-bargain case, and appellant does
not have a right to appeal. See id. R. 25.2; Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App.
2005) (holding court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial
court’s certification is accurate).
On January 29, 2025, we notified Appellant this appeal would be dismissed under Rule
25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification showing Appellant has the right of appeal was
made part of the appellate record by February 13, 2025. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; see
also Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 613; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 176 (Tex. App.—San Antonio
2003, no pet.). Appellant responded to our order through counsel explaining the trial court “has:
(1) followed the parties’ negotiated plea agreement; (2) ruled adversely on no matters raised by
written motion ruled upon prior to appellant’s plea; and (3) steadfastly refused to grant appellant
any permission to appeal.” Appellant’s counsel further explained she “reluctantly concludes this
court of appeals has little choice but to dismiss the instant attempted appeal.”
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cassandra Alicia Briones v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cassandra-alicia-briones-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.