Cassandra Alicia Briones v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 26, 2025
Docket04-24-00756-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Cassandra Alicia Briones v. the State of Texas (Cassandra Alicia Briones v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cassandra Alicia Briones v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00756-CR

Cassandra Alicia BRIONES, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022CR9133 Honorable Christine Del Prado, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Lori Massey Brissette, Justice Adrian A. Spears II, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 26, 2025

DISMISSED

Pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant pleaded nolo contendere to aggravated assault with a

deadly weapon. The trial court sentenced her to eight years of deferred adjudication community

supervision and a $1,000 fine on October 7, 2024. The trial court also signed a certification

stating this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP.

P. 25.2(a)(2).

“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, (B) after getting the trial court’s 04-24-00756-CR

permission to appeal, or (C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute.” Id.

However, we must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of

appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id. R. 25.2(d).

Here, the clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed

the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by appellant. The record includes

at least one motion by appellant that was ruled upon, but it was ruled upon in appellant’s favor

before trial, and the plea bargain provides appellant waived the right to appeal written pretrial

motions. Moreover, the trial court has not given appellant permission to appeal. Thus, the trial

court’s certification appears to accurately reflect this is a plea-bargain case, and appellant does

not have a right to appeal. See id. R. 25.2; Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App.

2005) (holding court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial

court’s certification is accurate).

On January 29, 2025, we notified Appellant this appeal would be dismissed under Rule

25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification showing Appellant has the right of appeal was

made part of the appellate record by February 13, 2025. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; see

also Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 613; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 176 (Tex. App.—San Antonio

2003, no pet.). Appellant responded to our order through counsel explaining the trial court “has:

(1) followed the parties’ negotiated plea agreement; (2) ruled adversely on no matters raised by

written motion ruled upon prior to appellant’s plea; and (3) steadfastly refused to grant appellant

any permission to appeal.” Appellant’s counsel further explained she “reluctantly concludes this

court of appeals has little choice but to dismiss the instant attempted appeal.”

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cassandra Alicia Briones v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cassandra-alicia-briones-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.