Cassady v. Reid

Indiana Supreme Court

Cassady v. Reid

4 Blackf. 178, 1836 Ind. LEXIS 24

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided December 3, 1836·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

IF an appeal to the Circuit Court from the judgment of a justjcej pe dismissed by the appellant in vacation under the [179]*179statute of 1834, before the defendant has appeared, the appellant is not subject to the payment of a docket-fee. And the mere entry in the case, of an attorney’s name for the defendant on the issue-docket, is not an appearance.

As the amount in controversy in such case (relative to the allowance of a docket-fee) is less than 20 dollars, the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction of the cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IF an appeal to the Circuit Court from the judgment of a justjcej pe dismissed by the appellant in vacation under the [179]*179statute of 1834, before the defendant has appeared, the appellant is not subject to the payment of a docket-fee. And the mere entry in the case, of an attorney’s name for the defendant on the issue-docket, is not an appearance.

As the amount in controversy in such case (relative to the allowance of a docket-fee) is less than 20 dollars, the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction of the cause.

Cassady v. Reid, 4 Blackf. 178, 1836 Ind. LEXIS 24 (Ind. 1836).

Pincite

4 Blackf. 178 (Cassady v. Reid) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related