Cassada v. Russo
This text of 345 F.2d 529 (Cassada v. Russo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
345 F.2d 529
John D. W. CASSADA, T. Cornell Berry, John R. Eggleston, and Edwin C. Kellam, Appellants,
v.
Philip L. RUSSO, Trustee in Bankruptcy, and Charles C. Skinner and W. Howard Walker, Appellees.
In the Matter of Hacienda Motel, Incorporated, Bankrupt.
No. 9879.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued May 6, 1965.
Decided May 14, 1965.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk; Walter E. Hoffman, Judge.
William L. Parker, Norfolk, Va., for appellants.
Montgomery Knight, Jr., Norfolk, Va. (Doumar, Pincus, Anderson & Knight, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for appellee W. Howard Walker.
P. A. Agelasto, Jr., Norfolk, Va., for appellee Charles C. Skinner.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and SOBELOFF and J. SPENCER BELL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Upon a careful review of the record and the briefs and arguments of counsel in this court, we are of the opinion that the decision of the district court, which affirmed the rulings of the referee in bankruptcy pertaining to the claims involved on this appeal, should be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
345 F.2d 529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cassada-v-russo-ca4-1965.