Cass v. Apfel
This text of 214 A.D. 735 (Cass v. Apfel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Interlocutory judgment reversed on the law and the facts, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. We think no general accounting covering the whole fifteen years of the partnership was necessary or proper in this case, but that the scope and extent of the accounting should have been limited. (Bushby v. Berkeley, 135 App. Div. 443.) We also think that there was no evidence to connect the defendant Sadie L. Apfel with any of the partnership transactions, and that the court should have received the evidence offered by plaintiff to connect her therewith. Kelly, P. J., Jayeox, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
214 A.D. 735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cass-v-apfel-nyappdiv-1925.