Casray Oil Corp. v. Royal Indemnity Co.

169 S.W.2d 955, 141 Tex. 33, 1943 Tex. LEXIS 282
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedApril 7, 1943
DocketNo. 8046
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 169 S.W.2d 955 (Casray Oil Corp. v. Royal Indemnity Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Casray Oil Corp. v. Royal Indemnity Co., 169 S.W.2d 955, 141 Tex. 33, 1943 Tex. LEXIS 282 (Tex. 1943).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Alexander

delivered the opinion of the Court.

[34]*34This is a garnishment case. Royal Indemnity Company, the garnishee, prevailed in the trial court, and that court allowed it an attorney’s fee of $250.00 for the services of an attorney in the trial court, and further provided that in the event an appeal was taken from the judgment, the garnishee should recover the sum of $50.00 for the services of the attorney in the Court of Civil Appeals and $50.00 for the services of such attorney in the Supreme Court. The judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 165 S. W. (2d) 244.

The Casray Oil Corporation, plaintiff in the lower court, assigned as error the action of the trial court in allowing the recovery of $100.00 for attorney’s fees in the event of an appeal. It was upon this assignment that we granted the writ or error. However, since the granting of the writ the granishee has remitted the $100 in controversy. Consequently, the question raised by the assignment has become moot.

The Court of Civil Appeals correctly decided all Other points. ■

The judgments of the trial court and Court of Civil Appeals, as reformed by the remittitur, will be affirmed. The costs in the Court of Civil Appeals and Supreme Court will be assessed against the respondent Royal Indemnity Company.

Opinion delivered April 7, 1943.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hibernia Energy III, LLC v. Ferae Naturae, LLC
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2022
Effel v. McGarry
339 S.W.3d 789 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011)
Texas Employment Commission v. Camarena
710 S.W.2d 665 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Bank of New Mexico v. Northwest Power Products, Inc.
1980 NMCA 121 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1980)
Los Campeones, Inc. v. Valley International Properties, Inc.
591 S.W.2d 312 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Robertson v. Land
519 S.W.2d 227 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1975)
Mea v. Mea
464 S.W.2d 201 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Gill v. Oak Cliff Bank & Trust Co.
331 S.W.2d 832 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1959)
First National Bank of Bryan v. Roberts ex rel. Prescott
286 S.W.2d 462 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 S.W.2d 955, 141 Tex. 33, 1943 Tex. LEXIS 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casray-oil-corp-v-royal-indemnity-co-tex-1943.