Casperson v. Newkirk

Court of Appeals of Texas

Casperson v. Newkirk

224 S.W.3d 276, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 5249, 2005 WL 1593565

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 7, 2005·No. 08-04-00191-CV·Published

Opinion

*277 OPINION

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

On February 7, 2005, we abated this appeal because the parties were engaged in settlement discussions. On June 17, 2005, the parties filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(a)(1), representing to the Court that all issues have been fully compromised and settled. The Courts abatement order of February 7, 2005, is lifted and the case is reinstated. After considering this cause on this motion, we conclude that the motion to dismiss should be granted. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*277 OPINION

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

On February 7, 2005, we abated this appeal because the parties were engaged in settlement discussions. On June 17, 2005, the parties filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(a)(1), representing to the Court that all issues have been fully compromised and settled. The Courts abatement order of February 7, 2005, is lifted and the case is reinstated. After considering this cause on this motion, we conclude that the motion to dismiss should be granted. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

Casperson v. Newkirk, 224 S.W.3d 276, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 5249, 2005 WL 1593565 (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

224 S.W.3d 276 (Casperson v. Newkirk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.