Casper v. . Walker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Casper v. . Walker

188 S.E. 99, 210 N.C. 838, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 257

DecidedNovember 4, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 188 S.E. 99 (Casper v. . Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Casper v. . Walker, 188 S.E. 99, 210 N.C. 838, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 257 (N.C. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff principally complains that the amount awarded by the jury to the defendant Lowe on his counterclaim exceeded the amount alleged in his answer, but it appears from an examination of the pleading that this defendant alleged, in effect, that he was entitled to recover $65.00 over and above all items due plaintiff. The assignment of error on this score cannot be sustained.

The other exceptions are without substantial merit. The case presented questions of fact which have been determined by the jury, and in the trial, we find

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff principally complains that the amount awarded by the jury to the defendant Lowe on his counterclaim exceeded the amount alleged in his answer, but it appears from an examination of the pleading that this defendant alleged, in effect, that he was entitled to recover $65.00 over and above all items due plaintiff. The assignment of error on this score cannot be sustained.

The other exceptions are without substantial merit. The case presented questions of fact which have been determined by the jury, and in the trial, we find

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 S.E. 99, 210 N.C. 838, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casper-v-walker-nc-1936.