Cason v. Williams

District Court, S.D. California·Decided April 30, 2020·No. 3:19-cv-00662·Unknown

Opinion

Michael Barrett Cason, Case No.: 3:19-CV-00662-GPC-BGS

Petitioner, ORDER DISMISSING v. DUPLICATIVE ACTION. Louis Williams, Warden, Respondent. On April 8, 2019, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 1.) Petitioner was denied leave to proceed IFP on April 10, 2019. (ECF No. 4.) Though Petitioner has filed various changes of address and one document entitled “Notice to Agent, Notice to Principle,” (ECF Nos. 5, 9, 11), he has not sought to proceed IFP again in this matter, nor amended his Petition. Instead, Petitioner has proceeded in a parallel, duplicative case. On March 29, 2019, Petitioner filed a preceding habeas petition pending before the Court. (Cason et al, Case No. 19-CV-0621, ECF No. 1.) In that Petition, Petitioner alleges substantially the same claims, albeit with more detail, as in this case. Petitioner, moreover, directs both suits at the same Defendant, Warden Louis Williams. And, Petitioner has continued to litigate that matter by, for example, filing another motion for IFP on October 3, 2019, which the Court then granted on December 19, 2019. (ECF Nos. 10, 11.) In light of the foregoing facts, the Court dismisses the above-captioned matter as duplicative. A litigant “ha[s] no right to maintain two separate actions involving the same subject matter at the same time in the same court and against the same defendant.” Walton v. Eaton Corp., 563 F.2d 66, 70 (3d Cir.1977); see also Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp., 95 F.3d 358, 362 (Sth Cir.1996). “When a plaintiff files a second complaint alleging the same claim as a prior, pending, related action, the second complaint may be dismissed.” Barapind vy. Reno, 72 F. Supp. 2d 1132, 1145 (E.D. 1999), aff'd, 225 F.3d 1100 (9th Cir. 2000) (citing Zerilli v. Evening News Assn., F.2d 217, 222 (D.C.Cir. 1980)). \ Accordingly, Petitioner’s action under Case No. 19-CV-0662 is DISMISSED. Petitioner may proceed to litigate his habeas petition in the already-filed Case No. 19-CV-0621. IT IS SO ORDERED. <— Dated: April 30, 2020 Carashe (A? United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cason v. Williams, (S.D. Cal. 2020).

Cason v. Williams (Cason v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cooper v. United States
9 F.2d 216 (Eighth Circuit, 1925)
Barapind v. Reno
72 F. Supp. 2d 1132 (E.D. California, 1999)
Walton v. Eaton Corp.
563 F.2d 66 (Third Circuit, 1977)