Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cason v. State

Cason v. State

260 So. 3d 1199
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 14, 2019
DocketNo. 1D17-4376
StatusPublished

This text of 260 So. 3d 1199 (Cason v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cason v. State, 260 So. 3d 1199 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Altaony Cason argues that his two convictions for resisting an officer without violence violate the prohibition against double jeopardy because both convictions were based on one continuous criminal episode, albeit involving two officers. The State concedes error, and we agree. E.g. , R.J.R. v. State , 88 So.3d 264, 266-68 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) ; D.A.R. v. State , 22 So.3d 850, 851 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) ; Fogle v. State , 754 So.2d 878, 879 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). We reverse and remand for the trial court to vacate one of the convictions. See Johnson v. State , 246 So.3d 1277 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018).

Rowe, Osterhaus, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fogle v. State
754 So. 2d 878 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Akeem William David Johnson v. State of Florida
246 So. 3d 1277 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
D.A.R. v. State
22 So. 3d 850 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
R.J.R. v. State
88 So. 3d 264 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 So. 3d 1199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cason-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.