Cason v. State
This text of 673 So. 2d 986 (Cason v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cassandra Dee Cason (Cason) challenges her judgment and sentence for possession of cocaine. Her appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm Cason’s conviction and sentence, but reverse and remand for correction of a scrivener’s error contained in the judgment. The judgment incorrectly cites section 893.13(l)(a) instead of section 893.13(6)(a), Florida Statutes (1993). Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND for correction of the scrivener’s error. Cason’s judgment and sentence is affirmed in all other respects.
[987]*987AFFIRM in part; REVERSE and REMAND in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
673 So. 2d 986, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5483, 1996 WL 279911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cason-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.