Cason v. State

481 So. 2d 1006, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 298, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6115
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 30, 1986
DocketNo. BE-238
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 481 So. 2d 1006 (Cason v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cason v. State, 481 So. 2d 1006, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 298, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6115 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Cason appeals a sentence imposed outside the sentencing guidelines on the ground that the trial court did not express clear and convincing reasons for the departure. We find that, of the six reasons stated by the trial court, reasons one (extensive arrest record and numerous prior convictions) and five (deterrence of others) are invalid; the remaining four are proper. There being no reasonable doubt that a different sentence would be imposed on remand, see Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985), we affirm.

[1007]*1007ERVIN and WIGGINTON, JJ., and McCORD, GUYTE P., Jr. (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mitchell v. State
507 So. 2d 686 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Bailey v. State
492 So. 2d 738 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
481 So. 2d 1006, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 298, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cason-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.