Cason v. State
481 So. 2d 1006, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 298, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6115
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 30, 1986·No. No. BE-238·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Cason appeals a sentence imposed outside the sentencing guidelines on the ground that the trial court did not express clear and convincing reasons for the departure. We find that, of the six reasons stated by the trial court, reasons one (extensive arrest record and numerous prior convictions) and five (deterrence of others) are invalid; the remaining four are proper. There being no reasonable doubt that a different sentence would be imposed on remand, see Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985), we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cason v. State, 481 So. 2d 1006, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 298, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6115 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
481 So. 2d 1006 (Cason v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mitchell v. State
507 So. 2d 686 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Bailey v. State
492 So. 2d 738 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)